Post any interesting links in the comment section.
Local
- Tucson Race Draws Father, Son Cyclists For 85-Mile Segment
- El Tour has been a real plus for city over the years
State
- Cycle: Underground Crit Brings Aggressive Group Riding
- Making bike trips to the city dump
- Freak bike crash kills professor
National
- SFMTA Report: JFK Protected Bike Lanes Have Calmed Park Traffic
- Moving People or Moving Vehicles: How Should We Grade America’s Streets?
- Interbike 2013 open to consumers
- Giant donates 100 bikes to New York hurricane relief
- America’s Five Least Bike-Friendly Cities
- Only in Seattle: An apartment building designed for bicyclists
International
- Japanese automated bicycle parking garage deposits and retrieves your ride
- The 15th Percentile – Survival of the Fittest?
- Cargo Bike History – Svajere in Copenhagen
“It should be noted that Mr. Meneses was not wearing a helmet at
the time of the collision.” (TPD’s Sgt. Maria Hawke)
(From the department of sly and irrelevant):
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/police/media-releases/Fatal_Motor_Vehicle_Collision_-_Glenn_and_First_101012.pdf
The motorist, not the late Mr. Menses, was found at fault, according to TPD media release…
Well, this might give cyclists another something to think about:
“Moral Machines”
it’s over here,
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/11/google-driverless-car-morality.html
Still so much safer to a cyclist than a pedestrian.
Could it be that he could have survived the accident had he been wearing a helmet?
I know having a helmet saved my brother’s life when he has taken a spill (on more than one occasion) and it also saved the life of the guy that ran into the back of his car while he was stopped at a stop light. It looked like someone shoved a bowling ball into his trunk. In my mind it’s not an irrelevant statement, if it could have made a difference.
In Arizona, adult cyclists are not required by statute to wear a helmet. Whether they should or not is debatable and the epidemiology of helmet non use remains unresolved. In practice, it seems to be an individual choice and, yes, in hindsight, individuals sometimes seem to make bad choices.
Perhaps you can find a Tucson Police Department media release regarding a fatal car-on-car or car-on-fixed object accident in which it is noted that the motorists and passengers were not wearing helmets or the motor vehicle(s) did not have airbags.
Sorry to learn of your brother’s unfortunate spills.
Thanks, part of the dangers of being a bicycle commuter in San Francisco (slick rails, slick cobblestones, etc), but he still rides and takes the train to work every day.
I’m guessing the non-helmet epidemiology would be similar to motorists not wearing their seatbelts. Seatbelts weren’t always required by law, so maybe when enough people die without helmets on, there will be a change in behavior.
Mention of airbag deployment, or not, has become an item of note in some reports, but maybe not the TPD press releases.